2004 Chinook Concourse Rear Stabilizer Bushing??

Everything about Chinooks that isn't option specific. Please check if your post is more appropriate in another category before posting here.
User avatar
Blue~Go
Senior Member
Posts: 3797
Joined: July 31st, 2014, 1:01 am
Location: 1999 Concourse

Re: 2004 Chinook Concourse Rear Stabilizer Bushing??

Post by Blue~Go »

That's a good question, Mark. I too, don't have More-Ryde - just the stock Ford springs except for what I changed (shocks, anti-sway bar). I also don't know how a Chinook comparable in every other way but More-Ryde would ride compared to mine.

I did find that after I did my upgrades (beefy rear anti-sway bar especially), I got a bit of an active rear spring situation. Like harsh mini hops when going over small bumps. Not acceptable. At the time I was at a place that specializes in suspension, including lots of E-Series chassis vehicles. They said it's a common thing, and especially ambulances work to smooth it out (for obvious reasons). They were at the time interested in parabolic springs (they replace the leafs). I had just spent a bundle on various upgrades (suspension, new front end) so I made a couple of teaks, got it as good as it was before (but with *much* better handling) and called it good for that round. Those re-tweaks included a less aggressive anti-sway bar (but originally it had none) and adjustable rear shocks.

I strongly considered the Sulastic springs (these are another type of rubber link at the leaf attachment, but maybe stronger than More-Ryde?) while I was there, but I found they were not easy to choose and source in a quick fashion at that time, so I have still not tried them. I don't remember the shop thinking they looked very hard to install. Anyone here tried them?
1999 Concourse
chin_k
**Forum Contributor**
Posts: 2257
Joined: June 26th, 2017, 9:38 pm
Location: Southern CA

Re: 2004 Chinook Concourse Rear Stabilizer Bushing??

Post by chin_k »

I would be interested to know if other alternative is better. I got mine with one side broke, and not realized what it was, so I don't know how long it lasted, but it looks like original, and the rig was 17 yrs old. back then. The other side broke a few months ago, and it was like 18 yrs. This is the oldest vehicle I ever have own, so I don't know if that is acceptable for a suspension component. Obviously, the leaf springs last many decades, but I did not drive a Chinook with modified suspension to tell if which one is better. Anyone been to a Chinook rally, and tried a few configurations and noticed the difference?
2000 Concourse dinette, on 1999 6.8L Ford E350 Triton V-10 Chassis
User avatar
Astrodokk
Posts: 453
Joined: July 30th, 2014, 7:06 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: 2004 Chinook Concourse Rear Stabilizer Bushing??

Post by Astrodokk »

I think if mine ends up failing in what I would deem a short amount of time, I will remove them and place stock shackles back there.
But there had to be a reason why Chinook added that as a XL option (I think), bc it softens up the ride.
2000 Ford E-350 415CI/6.8L V-10 Triton Superduty 4X4 Chinook Concourse XL Club Lounge
dougm
Senior Member
Posts: 516
Joined: June 7th, 2016, 9:25 pm

Re: 2004 Chinook Concourse Rear Stabilizer Bushing??

Post by dougm »

There are always alternatives...
vlcsnap-2016-07-29-02h17m10s438.png
main reservoir.png
air.png
Post Reply